General Course Information
1.1 Course details
|Course name:||Evidence I|
|Programme offered under:||LLB Programme|
|Semester:||First and Second|
|Designated research course:||Not applicable|
|Prerequisites / Co-requisites:||Criminal Law I & II|
|Course offered to non-law students:||No|
|Credit point value||6 credits|
1.2 Course description
The course covers the major topics typically included in an introductory evidence course: relevance, admissibility, residual discretion, burden and standards of proof, proof without evidence (presumptions, judicial notice and formal admissions), competence and compellability, refreshing memory, attacking credibility, prior statements, character evidence, similar fact evidence, opinion and expert evidence, hearsay, confessions, consciousness of guilt, exclusion of evidence for violations of human rights, and legal professional privilege.
The emphasis in this course is on rules of admissibility as opposed to trial procedure. However, a full understanding of these rules and their rationale requires a basic appreciation of trial procedures and practices. Consequently, students are advised to gain some knowledge of trial procedures early on in the course.
1.3 Course teachers
|Course convenor / tutor (first semester)||Jacky Yeungfirstname.lastname@example.org||CCT 814||By appointment / email|
|Course tutor (first semester)||Ted Chanemail@example.com||N/A||By email|
|Course tutor (first semester)||Anthony Laifirstname.lastname@example.org||N/A||By email|
|Course tutor (second semester)||Edward Ngemail@example.com||N/A||By email|
|Course tutor (second semester)||Kelly Shumfirstname.lastname@example.org||N/A||By email|
2.1 Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) for this course
CLO 1 Describe and discuss the legal doctrines governing the admissibility and exclusion of evidence in Hong Kong civil and criminal proceedings.
CLO 2 Discuss the underlying principles, policies and justifications of having the evidentiary rules.
CLO 3 Apply the legal doctrines governing the admissibility and exclusion of evidence to a given fact situation, paying particular attention to developing overt arguments explaining the relevance (or irrelevance) of specific items of evidence to specific issues, as well as matters of weight.
CLO 4 Explain how the trial judge should instruct the jury in the use of admissible evidence generally and in a given fact situation.
CLO 5 Identify, explain and apply the ratio decidendi of judicial decision and/or statutory provisions related to the law of evidence.
CLO 6 Write well-reasoned legal advice, citing appropriate cases and/or statutory provisions, to advise hypothetical clients with their legal problems in a given fact situation.
2.2 LLB Programme Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Please refer to the following link: https://course.law.hku.hk/llb-plo/
2.3 Programme Learning Outcomes to be achieved in this course
|PLO A||PLO B||PLO C||PLO D||PLO E||PLO F|
3.1 Assessment Summary
|Assessment task||Due date||Weighting||Feedback method*||Course learning outcomes|
|Tutorial participation||N/A||0% or 20%||1, 5||1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6|
|Final exam||TBA||100% or 80%||1, 3||1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6|
|*Feedback method (to be determined by course teacher)|
|1||A general course report to be disseminated through Moodle|
|2||Individual feedback to be disseminated by email / through Moodle|
|3||Individual review meeting upon appointment|
|4||Group review meeting|
|5||In-class verbal feedback|
3.2 Assessment Detail
To be advised by course convenor(s).
3.3 Grading Criteria
Please refer to the following link: https://www.law.hku.hk/_files/law_programme_grade_descriptors.pdf
4.1 Learning Activity Plan
|Lecture:||2 hours / week for 12 teaching weeks|
|Tutorial:||1 hour / week for 12 teaching weeks|
|Private study time:||9.5 hour / week for 12 teaching weeks|
Remarks: the normative student study load per credit unit is 25 ± 5 hours (ie. 150 ± 30 hours for a 6-credit course), which includes all learning activities and experiences within and outside of classroom, and any assessment task and examinations and associated preparations.
4.2 Details of Learning Activities
The Tutorial Participation assessment is in place to incentivise students:- (i) to keep up with the teaching progress of the course throughout the semester; (ii) to familiarize themselves with the essential issues and applicable cases/legislation in each of the individual topics of the course; (iii) to assist students with the self-identification of their own strengths and/or weaknesses when answering tutorial questions; (iv) to facilitate academic discussions among students within individual tutorial groups and/or (if necessary) further discussions among students and teachers in lectures and tutorials.
The final assessment assesses whether students have achieved the learning outcome for the course as a whole. Compulsory questions of the examination shall test students fundamental knowledge of various topics of the course, whereas optional questions (if available) shall test students in-depth knowledge of selected individual topics.
|Prescribed (compulsory) reading materials:||There are no compulsory textbooks for this course. Other prescribed reading materials (e.g. Lecture outlines/slides, cases and legislation) shall be posted on Moodle.|
|Suggested (non-compulsory) reading materials:||Students may consider any of the following recommended (non-compulsory) textbooks:-
|Other materials cited in the teaching materials (Subject to further changes):||
Please refer to the following link: http://www.law.hku.hk/course/learning-resources/
[Last updated on 3 August 2021]